The Myth of Rich and Poor: Why Society Sees the Poor as Honest and the Rich as Evil

Haobam Pravinsen
Aug 18
5 min read

The Myth of Rich and Poor: Why Society Sees the Poor as Honest and the Rich as Evil

Throughout history, societies have created myths and narratives to explain wealth, poverty, and morality. One of the most enduring narratives is the belief that rich people are inherently corrupt, manipulative, or evil, while poor people are seen as honest, hardworking, and virtuous. This binary, though emotionally appealing, often distorts the complex realities of human behavior.

The truth is more nuanced: wealth and poverty do not determine morality. Both rich and poor have their share of virtues and vices, and yet society tends to attach rigid labels to each. To understand why this perception exists and why it often leads to misplaced blame or misplaced admiration, we must look deeper into psychology, history, and human behavior.

The Origin of the Narrative: Why We Romanticize the Poor

Human beings have long associated suffering with purity. From folklore to religious texts, stories glorify the struggles of the poor while villainizing the powerful. In literature, the poor peasant is often painted as honest, humble, and hardworking, while the wealthy landlord is depicted as greedy and oppressive.

This narrative serves a psychological function. It comforts the poor by giving meaning to their suffering: if they do not have wealth, at least they have virtue. It also acts as a moral balance—society convinces itself that the rich may have money, but the poor have honesty, which is of higher moral value.

However, this is not always true in reality. Poverty does not automatically cultivate honesty. Many petty crimes, thefts, and acts of violence often arise from poor communities—not because the poor are inherently immoral, but because survival pressures can push people to act in desperate ways. No one steals for pleasure when their basic needs are already secure. Poverty creates conditions where moral choices are constrained.

Why the Rich Are Cast as Villains

The rich, on the other hand, are often accused of being exploitative, selfish, or arrogant. There are several reasons for this perception:

Visibility of Power: Wealth grants visibility. A rich person’s mistakes or excesses are on display, while the struggles of the poor are hidden. A single corrupt billionaire becomes a symbol for all wealthy people.
Psychological Projection: Many people dream of becoming rich but never achieve it. This unfulfilled desire can easily turn into resentment. By demonizing the wealthy, people justify their own lack of success.
Cultural Narratives: From Robin Hood to modern films, the idea of the greedy rich and the virtuous poor is reinforced. These stories, though entertaining, condition us to see wealth as synonymous with evil.

Yet the reality is far more complex. Many wealthy individuals are the very engines of progress in society. They create businesses that provide jobs, invest in innovation, and even donate significant portions of their wealth to charitable causes. When a family is struggling, it is often the wealthy relative, friend, or local businessman who lends money, property, or resources.

The Discipline Behind Wealth

While luck and circumstances play undeniable roles in wealth creation, another often-overlooked factor is discipline. Most people who sustain wealth over generations do so not merely through inheritance but by establishing boundaries, habits, and financial discipline.

They control spending, make calculated risks, and delay gratification—traits that psychologists call executive functioning skills, which are linked to success in many areas of life. In contrast, many people remain trapped in poverty because they avoid risk, stay comfortable in familiarity, or fail to break free from short-term thinking.

This is not to blame the poor for their condition—systemic inequalities and lack of opportunities are also major barriers. But the fact remains: many who rise to wealth do so by adopting structures of discipline that others may resist.

The Complexity of Poverty: Not Always Noble

While poverty often breeds resilience, it does not automatically produce virtue. Some of the most violent crimes, thefts, and disruptions in society are committed by individuals struggling for survival. This does not make them evil, but it does challenge the assumption that all poor people are noble victims.

Psychological research shows that scarcity itself reduces decision-making capacity. The scarcity mindset theory, proposed by Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir, suggests that when people are under financial pressure, their ability to make long-term, rational decisions decreases. They may engage in short-term gains—like theft, gambling, or violence—that harm them in the long run.

Thus, poverty can sometimes foster conditions for dishonesty, not because poor people are immoral, but because the environment restricts choices.

Why Society Needs a Balanced View

Demonizing the rich and romanticizing the poor creates a distorted picture of human reality. Both groups are made up of human beings with virtues and flaws.

Rich people are not inherently evil. Many are job creators, community supporters, and philanthropists. Without their investments, large parts of society would lack employment, resources, and opportunities.
Poor people are not always noble victims. Many are hardworking and honest, but some commit acts of violence or theft—not because they enjoy it, but because circumstances force their hand.

A society that insists on painting one group as entirely virtuous and the other as entirely corrupt is not only unjust but also impractical. It prevents genuine understanding and cooperation between classes.

Psychological Reasons Behind the Divide

Cognitive Bias: Humans like simple explanations. “Rich = bad, Poor = good” is easier to understand than grappling with complex truths.
Moral Compensation: Seeing the poor as virtuous helps balance the unfairness of inequality. It gives psychological comfort.
Envy and Resentment: Envy often disguises itself as moral criticism. By condemning the rich, people protect their ego from the pain of comparison.
Narrative Tradition: Generations of cultural myths reinforce this binary, making it feel natural even when it contradicts reality.

Moving Beyond Myths

If we want a healthier society, we must move past these false binaries. Instead of labeling people by their wealth, we should evaluate them by their character, choices, and contributions.

Celebrate discipline and responsibility. The rich who build and share deserve respect, not automatic suspicion.
Support the struggling without glorifying poverty. Helping the poor means giving them opportunities to rise, not freezing them in the role of “honest sufferers.”
Recognize shared humanity. Both rich and poor have the capacity for good and evil. Both deserve empathy, but also accountability.

Conclusion: Toward a Mature Perspective

The world is not divided neatly into good poor and evil rich. Poverty can bring out both resilience and desperation, while wealth can bring out both generosity and arrogance. What truly matters is not the amount of money one has, but the discipline, choices, and character one develops.

The myth of the “evil rich” and the “honest poor” may comfort us, but it blinds us to reality. The real progress of society depends on breaking these illusions and building a culture that values discipline, opportunity, and fairness over simplistic stereotypes.

When we stop blaming wealth and romanticizing poverty, we can finally begin to appreciate the complexity of human lives—and work toward a society where success is possible without resentment, and dignity is available to all.

For more understanding